Psycho-Educational Testing
Van Dyke Public Schools

Principles of
Psycho-Educational Testing
Standardized cognitive and academic testing has existed since the beginning
of the
20th century. The
Binet-Simon Scale was developed in 1916 to identify cognitive impairment in
French children. In 1916, Lewis Terman revised this test and provided an
American standardization of the scales. This event marked the beginning of
standardized assessment of human mental functions in America.
During
the course of the next 85 years, standardized testing has developed into an
essential component in the understanding of human development and learning, in
addition to
educational and clinical practice and research. The term “standardized”
refers to a test which has a standard method of administration and which
has been normed from a demographically representative sample. The MEAP,
SAT, ACT, GRE,
LSAT are all standardized group achievement tests. The WJ
III, WISC IV, and Stanford-Binet 4th Edition are all standardized
individual intelligence tests. Standardized tests
exist in many other
forms; there exist hundreds of tests designed to measure a broad range of people’s attributes and skills, such
as visual-motor integration,
attention, adaptive functioning, depressive symptomatology, work aptitude,
marital satisfaction,
etc. Psycho-educational testing is a process which
utilizes standardized tests and questionnaires in an effort to
identify a student’s strengths and weaknesses across
many areas of
functioning and attributes. These areas include but are not limited to
the
following:
·
Cognitive
Development
·
Academic
Achievement
·
Adaptive
Functioning
·
Visual
Perception
·
Motor
Coordination
·
Visual-Motor Integration
·
Behavior
(e.g., Attention, Aggression, etc.)
·
Emotion
(e.g., Anxiety, Depression, etc.)
Psychoeducational testing is conducted on an individual basis. Since the
examiner, in a controlled testing
situation, is able to monitor the examinee’s level of effort,
individually-
administered tests provide more valid estimates of the
individual’s skills as compared to group-administered tests. Often, a
child’s performances will be better in an individual testing situation than his/her
performances in the classroom.
With this
in mind, it is important to remember that the purpose of individualized
testing
is to provide the most
valid estimates of the child’s actual skill levels. In an
uncontrolled
environment, such as the classroom, many extraneous factors (e.g.,
visual
and auditory distractions) can prevent a child from performing optimally.

Terms Used in
Standardized Testing

Following
is a list of terms used in standardized testing as defined
by Sattler (1990):
Validity
is
the degree to which a test measures what it is supposed to
measure.
Reliability
refers to the consistency of a measurement. A test with a
low degree of reliability should not be
used.
Representativeness
refers to the extent to which the norm group is
characteristic of a particular population.
Normal Curve
is a very common type of distribution of scores. Many
psychological traits are distributed
roughly along a normal curve. Although a perfect normal
curve is rarely achieved, small variations do not
appreciably change the relevant statistical
interpretations. An important feature of the normal curve
is that
it enables us to calculate exactly how many cases fall
between any two points under the curve.
Raw Score
is
the score an individual obtains on a test before it is
transformed into a standard score.
Subtest
is a
single test. Most intelligence tests will contain a number
of different subtests, each measuring a certain skill or
skills.
Composite
is
two or more subtests combined. For example, the Basic
Reading Composite of the WJ III is
comprised of the Letter-Word Identification and Word Attack
subtests.
Mean
is a
mathematical average of all the scores in a set of scores.
To obtain the mean, divide the sum of
all the scores by the total number of scores in the set (N).
Standard Deviation
is
the extent to which scores deviate from the mean.
Standard Scores
are
raw scores that have been transformed to have a given mean
and standard deviation.
They express how far an examinee’s score lies from the mean
of the distribution in terms of the standard deviation. For
example, the WISC IV has a mean standard score of 100, with
each standard deviation being
15 points. A standard score of 85 would be one standard
deviation below the mean.
Percentile Ranks
are
derived scores that permit us to determine an individual’s
position relative to the standardization sample (or any
other specific sample). A percentile rank is a point in a
distribution at or below which the scores of a given
percentage of individuals fall. If 63 percent of the scores
fall below a given score, then that score is at the 63rd
percentile rank.
Age Equivalent
is a
score derived by computing the mean raw score of a measure
for a group of children with
a specific age. An age equivalent score of 9.5 on a reading
test means that the child is reading at a level which is
similar to that of the average nine year, six month old
child.
Grade Equivalent
is a
score derived by computing the mean raw score obtained by
children in each grade. It is usually expressed in tenths
of a grade. A grade equivalent score of 3.5 on a reading
test means that the
child is reading at a level consistent with the average
child who is in the middle of the third grade.
Standard Error of
Measurement
is the
estimate of the amount of error usually attached to an
examinee’s
obtained score. It is directly related to the reliability
of a test: the larger the standard error of measurement, the
lower the reliability.
Confidence Interval
is a
band or range of scores that has a high probability of
including the examinee’s true
score. The standard error of measurement provides the basis
for forming the confidence interval. A 95
percent confidence interval can be thought of as the range
in which a person’s true score will be found 95
percent of the time.
Stanines
provide a single-digit scoring system with a mean of 5 and a
standard deviation of 2. The scores are expressed as whole
numbers from 1 to 9.
T-Score
is a
standard score based on a distribution with a mean of 50 and
a standard deviation of 10.
Statistical
Significance
is the
extent to which the findings differ from chance occurrence.
Convention has established the .05 level as the minimum
significance level indicating that observed differences are
real; such results would occur 5 percent of the time by
chance..
Sattler, J.M. (1990). Assessment of Children: Third
Edition. San Diego, CA:
San Diego State University

Description of
Tests and Questionnaires

Tests and
questionnaires used in a psycho-educational evaluation
depend
upon the nature of the difficulties the student is
experiencing. In every assessment, School Psychologists
will typically obtain measures of cognitive ability,
academic achievement, visual perception, motor coordination,
and visual-motor integration skills. Standardized tests are
the most appropriate,
and are typically the only kinds of tests given by School
Psychologists to determine a student’s functional levels.
Depending upon
the student’s difficulties, Dr. Rickman (or any School
Psychologist) may administer a combination of the following
tests, rating scales, or questionnaires:
Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational
Battery – Third
Edition
The Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-educational
Battery – Third Edition (WJ III) is
a comprehensive test battery used for assessing cognitive
and academic achievement skills in individuals aged 2 years
through 90 years. One of the
most important features of the WJ III system is that the
norms for the
cognitive and achievement tests are based on data from the
same sample of subjects. This allows direct comparisons
among and within a subject’s scores that have a degree of
accuracy not possible when comparing scores from separately
normed tests. In addition to providing ability/achievement
discrepancies, co-norming enables examiners to jointly
evaluate domain-
specific achievement skills and the cognitive abilities
related to those skills (McGrew & Woodcock, 2001).
The theoretical foundation of the WJ III
Cognitive Battery is derived from the Cattell-Horn-Carroll
theory of cognitive abilities (CHC theory). This is a
multi-level approach to the understanding of broad and
narrow abilities. Broad cognitive abilities include areas
such as Comprehension-Knowledge (Gc), Fluid Reasoning
(Gf), Short-Term Memory (Gsm), Long-Term
Retrieval (Glr), Processing Speed (Gs),
Visual-Spatial Thinking (Gv), and Auditory Processing
(Ga). These broad intellectual abilities have also
been referred to as Central Processing Skills.
The administration of the WJ III Cognitive
Battery can yield measures in each Central Processing Skill
area. In other words, it yields a profile of a student’s
performances across multiple areas of intelligence. These
areas of intelligence are differentially associated with
academic achievement across the lifespan.
As part of his evaluations, Dr. Rickman
administers selective subtests of the
WJ III Cognitive and Achievement batteries. Descriptions of
those subtests which are most frequently administered by Dr.
Rickman, as adapted from
Mather and Woodcock (2001), appear below:
WJ III Cognitive Tests
Verbal Comprehension
measures aspects of language development in spoken English
language, such as knowledge of vocabulary or the ability to
reason using lexical (word) knowledge.
Visual-Auditory Learning
measures the ability to learn, store, and retrieve a series
of visual-auditory associations. On this test of
associative and meaningful memory, the child is asked to
learn and recall rebuses (pictographic representations of
words).
Spatial Relations
requires the identification of two or three pieces that form
a complete target shape, a
visualization-of-spatial-relationships task.
Sound Blending
measures skill in synthesizing language sounds (phonemes).
The child is asked to listen to a series of syllables or
phonemes and then to blend the sounds into a word.
Concept Formation
measures categorical reasoning ability. This test also
measures flexibility in thinking. The child is presented
with a complete stimulus set from which to derive the rule
for each item. Immediate feedback is provided regarding the
correctness of each response before a new item is presented.
Visual Matching
measures an aspect of cognitive efficiency-- the speed at
which the child can make visual symbol discriminations. The
child is asked to locate and circle the two identical
numbers in a row of six numbers. This task proceeds in
difficulty from single-digit numbers to triple-digit numbers
and has a 3-minute time limit.
Numbers Reversed
requires the child to hold a span of numbers in
immediate awareness (memory) while performing a mental
operation on it (reversing the sequence).
Incomplete Words
measures auditory analysis and auditory closure, aspects of
phonemic awareness and phonetic coding. After hearing, from
an audio recording, a word that has one or more phonemes
missing, the child is asked to identify the complete word.
Auditory Working Memory
measures short-term auditory memory span. The child is
asked to listen to a series that contains digits and words,
such as "dog, 1, shoe, 8, 2, apple." He/she is then asked
to reorder the information, repeating first the objects in
sequential order and then the digits in sequential order.
This task requires the child to hold information in
immediate awareness, divide the information into two groups,
and shift attentional resources to the two new ordered
sequences.
WJ III Achievement
Tests
Letter-Word Identification
measures the ability to identify letters and words. For
this test, the child is not required to know the meaning of
any word.
Reading Fluency
measures the ability to quickly read simple sentences,
decide if the statement is true, and then circle Yes or No.
The child is asked to complete as many items as possible
within a 3-minute time limit.
Calculation
measures the ability to perform
mathematical computations. The items requires the child to
perform addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division
operations.
Math Fluency
measures the child’s ability to solve simple addition,
subtraction, and multiplication facts quickly. The child is
presented with a series of simple arithmetic problems to
complete in a 3-minute time limit.
Spelling
measures the child’s ability to
write orally presented words correctly.
Writing Fluency
measures the child’s skill in formulating and writing simple
sentences quickly. The child is required to write sentences
relating to a given stimulus picture that includes a set of
three words. This test has a 7-minute time limit.
Passage Comprehension
measures the ability to understand what he or she reads.
Some items involve use of pictures. The items become
increasingly difficult and require the child to read a short
passage and identify a missing key word that makes sense in
the context of the passage.
Applied Problems
measures the ability to analyze and solve math problems. To
solve the problems, the child is required to listen to the
problem, recognize the procedure to be followed, and then
perform relatively simple calculations. Because many of the
problems include extraneous information, the child needs to
decide not only the appropriate mathematical operations to
use but also what information to include in the calculation.
Writing Samples
measures the child’s skill in writing responses to a variety
of demands. The child is asked to produce written sentences
that are evaluated with respect to the quality of
expression. The child is not penalized for any errors in
basic writing skills, such as spelling or punctuation.
Word Attack
measure the child’s skill in applying phonic and structural
analysis skills. The initial items require him/her to
produce the sounds for single letters. This test requires
the child to pronounce letter combinations that are
phonically consistent, or regular, patterns in English
orthography but are nonwords or low-frequency words.
Quantitative Concepts
measures the child's knowledge of mathematical concepts,
symbols, and vocabulary. There are two subtests
administered: Concepts and Number Series. In the first
subtest, the child is required to count, use numbers and
concepts, and identify mathematical terms. In the second
subtest, the task require the child to look at a series of
numbers, figure out the pattern, and then provide the
missing number in the series.
McGrew,
K.S., & Woodcock, R.W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III:
Technical Manual.
Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
Mather, N. &
Woodcock, R.W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of
Cognitive
Abilities Examiner’s Manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside
Publishing Company.
The Wechsler
Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition (WISC-IV)
is an individually administered clinical instrument for
assessing the cognitive skills of children age 6 years 0
months through 16 years 11 months. It is comprised of 15
subtests, each measuring various facets of intelligence.
The theoretical
foundation of the WISC-IV is derived from Wechsler’s
original Verbal-Nonverbal theory of intelligence (1939).
The WISC-IV reflects an increased attention to the
importance of working memory and processing speed in the
importance of cognitive functioning. A complete
administration of the WISC-IV yields standard scores in the
following composite areas:
·
Verbal Comprehension Index
·
Perceptual Reasoning Index
·
Working Memory Index
·
Processing Speed Index
·
Full Scale IQ
Wechsler, D. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence.
Baltimore:
Williams & Wilkins.
Following are
descriptions of each of the WISC-IV subtests:
WISC-IV Verbal
Comprehension Subtests
Similarities
measures verbal reasoning and concept formation. It also
involves auditory comprehension, memory, distinction between
nonessential and essential features, and verbal expression.
This test requires the child to identify the similarity
between two ostensibly dissimilar items (words presented to
the child)
Vocabulary
measures the child’s word knowledge and verbal concept
formation. For the picture items, the child is required to
name the pictures in the stimulus book. For the verbal
items, the child is required to give definitions for words
the examiner reads aloud.
Comprehension
measures the child’s verbal
reasoning and conceptualization, verbal comprehension, and
verbal expression. This test requires the child to answer
questions based on his or her understanding of general
principles and social situations.
Information
measures the child’s ability to
acquire, retain, and retrieve general factual knowledge. It
involves crystallized intelligence, long-term memory, and
the ability to retain and retrieve information from school
and the environment. The test requires the child to answer
questions that address a broad range of general knowledge
topics.
Word Reasoning
measures verbal comprehension, analogical and general
reasoning ability, verbal abstraction, domain knowledge, the
ability to integrate and synthesize different types of
information, and the ability to generate alternative
concepts. This test requires the child to identify the
common concept being described in a series of clues.
WISC IV Perceptual
Reasoning Subtests
Block Design
measures the child’s ability to analyze and synthesize
abstract visual stimuli. This test requires the child to
view a constructed model or a picture in the stimulus book,
and use red-and-white blocks to re-create the design within
a specified time limit.
Picture Concepts
measures abstract, categorical reasoning ability. The child
is presented with two or three rows of pictures and chooses
one picture from each row to form a group with a common
characteristic.
Matrix Reasoning
measures fluid intelligence and provides a reliable estimate
of general nonverbal intelligence. This test requires the
child to view an incomplete matrix and select the missing
portion from 5 response options.
Picture Completion
measures visual perception and organization, concentration,
and visual recognition of essential details of objects.
This test requires the child to view a picture and then
point to or name the important part missing within a
specified time limit.
WISC IV Working Memory
Subtests
Digit Span
measures auditory short-term memory, sequencing skills,
attention, and concentration. The Digit Span Forward task
requires the child to repeat numbers in the same order as
read aloud by the examiner. Digit Span Backward requires
the child to repeat the numbers in the reverse order of that
presented by the examiner.
Letter-Number Sequencing
measures sequencing, mental manipulation, attention,
short-term auditory memory, visuo-spatial imaging, and
processing speed. It requires the child to read a sequence
of letters and numbers and recall the numbers in ascending
order and the letters in alphabetical order.
Arithmetic
measures mental
manipulation, concentration, attention, short- and long-term
memory, numerical reasoning ability, and mental alertness.
It requires the child to mentally solve a series of orally
presented arithmetic problems within a specified time limit.
WISC IV Processing
Speed Subtests
Coding
measures the child’s short-term memory, learning ability,
visual perception, visual-motor coordination, visual
scanning ability, cognitive flexibility, attention, and
motivation. It requires the child to copy symbols that are
paired with simple geometric shapes or numbers.
Symbol Search
measures
processing speed, short-term visual memory, visual-motor
coordination, cognitive flexibility, visual discrimination,
and concentration. This test requires the child to scan a
search group and indicate whether the target symbol(s)
matches any of the symbols in the search group within a
specified time limit.
Cancellation
measures
processing speed, visual selective attention, vigilance, and
visual neglect. It requires the child to scan both a random
and structured arrangement of pictures and mark target
pictures within a specified time limit.
Wechsler,
D. (2003). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for
Children – Fourth Edition. San Antonio: The
Psychological Corporation.
Developmental Test of Visual-Motor
Integration
The Developmental Test of Visual Motor
Integration is an individually administered,
paper-and-pencil test of visual-motor skills, which requires
the child to duplicate several basic geometric figures by
drawing them. A child’s performance on this test involves
fine motor development, perceptual discrimination skills,
and the ability to integrate perceptual and motor
processes. Therefore, it involves both perceptual Input
and motor Output. Poor performances on this test
may be indicative of perceptual (input) difficulties, fine
motor (output) difficulties, and/or problems with
integrating these processes.
Beery, Keith (1997). The
Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor
Integration: Administration, Scoring, and Teaching Manual (4th
Edition). New Jersey: Modern Curriculum Press.
VMI Developmental Test
of Visual Perception
The VMI Developmental
Test of Visual Perception is an individually administered,
paper-and-pencil test of visual perceptual skills, which
requires the child to identify duplicate geometric
designs. No complex drawing is involved on this test. A
child’s performance on this test involves the
interpretation of visual stimuli rather than visual
acuity. In other words, it provides a measure of the
child’s perceptual input skills, or the ability to
analyze and synthesize parts and wholes of visual stimuli.
Beery, Keith (1997). The Beery-Buktenica
Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration:
Administration, Scoring, and Teaching Manual (4th
Edition). New Jersey: Modern Curriculum Press.
VMI Developmental Test
of Motor Coordination
The VMI Developmental
Test of Motor Coordination is an individually administered,
paper–and-pencil test of motor coordination skills, which
requires the child to connect dots and draw between lines to
duplicate designs. A child’s performance on this test
involves the ability to control finger and hand movements.
Therefore, this test assesses motor output skills.
Beery, Keith (1997). The Beery-Buktenica
Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration:
Administration, Scoring, and Teaching Manual (4th
Edition). New Jersey: Modern Curriculum Press.
Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth
Edition
The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition
(SB-IV) is used to appraise cognitive skills of individuals
from ages 2 to adult.
A complete administration of the SB-IV will yield composite
scores in the following areas:
·
Verbal Reasoning
·
Abstract/Visual Reasoning
·
Quantitative Reasoning
·
Short-Term Memory
·
Test
Composite
Thorndike, R.L., Hagen, E.P., & Sattler, J.M. (1986).
Stanford-
Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition. Chicago, IL:
Riverside Publishing Co.
Human Figure
Drawing
The Human Figure Drawing is a paper-and-pencil test which
requires the child to produce a drawing of a person. The
child’s response is scored according to the number of
essential features (e.g., head, torso, arms, legs, feet,
etc.) included in the drawing. The number of essential
features in the drawing is considered to be an indication of
the child’s overall mental maturity or cognitive
development. For example, the well-developed four year old
child can be expected to include a head, torso, two arms,
two legs, mouth, nose, and eyes. In the young child, these
features may be added onto a stick figure. Stick-figures in
the drawings of an older child approximately beyond the age
of five years would be more uncommon, and may be considered
a reflection of mental immaturity.
In some cases, children’s drawings may be analyzed to
determine the presence of emotional disturbance in
children. It is not uncommon that traumatic life events
(e.g., physical or sexual abuse) are reflected in a child’s
drawings. Analyses of children’s drawings in this manner
are used to corroborate other, more reliable information
garnered from child and parent interviews, medical records,
etc.
Harris, D.B. (1963). Children’s drawings as measures of
intellectual maturity: A revision
and extension of the Goodenough Draw-A-Man Test. New
York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Orthographic Processing involves the ability
to recognize words by their letter patterns and to apply the
alphabetic principle to print. Difficulties in this area
often results in poor and non-automatic sight word
recognition and spelling, even though the child’s phonics
analysis strategies might be well developed. The Test of
Orthographic Processing Skills was developed in an effort to
discriminate between children with phonetic and orthographic
difficulties. A child who makes age-inappropriate
phonetic-based errors on when writing will tend not to have
difficulties with phonics but rather, will often have
orthographic processing problems.
The Test of Orthographic Processing Skills is
an unpublished test, created and used by Dr. Rickman, which
was normed in the Van Dyke Public School District. It
requires the child to identify correctly spelled words
(“Real Words”) among a series of phonically consistent
pseudowords. If a child obtains a low score on this test
then it is likely that the child has difficulties with
orthographic processing and may require reading intervention
which is different from phonics-based approaches.
Gordon Diagnostic System III-R
The Gordon Diagnostic
System is a microprocessor-based test of sustained attention
and impulsivity. On this test, the child is presented with
a long sequence of numbers which flash at a rate of
one-per-second on an LED screen. The child is required to
push a large button every time the number “9” follows the
number “1”. Errors of Omission, which are believed to
reflect lapses in attention, are made when the 9 follows the
1 and the child does not push the button. Errors of
Commission, which are believed to reflect impulsivity, are
made when the child pushes the button for the wrong numbers.
Gordon,
M., McClure, F.D., Aylward, G.P. (1997). Interpretive Guide
to the Gordon
Diagnostic System – Third Edition. DeWitt, NY: Gordon
Systems, Inc.
Vineland
Adaptive Behavior Scales
The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales was developed to
assess adaptive functioning in individuals aged from birth
to 18 years, 11 months. It is a norm-referenced rating
scale comprised of 297 items. The respondent answers
questions relating to the child’s current functioning in the
areas of receptive, expressive, and written communication;
personal, domestic, and community daily living skills; and
socialization skills in the areas of interpersonal
relationships, play and leisure time, and coping skills.
There is also a motor skills domain, where gross and fine
motor skills development is assessed.
Standard scores, age-equivalents, adaptive levels, and
percentile scores are obtained in each domain and subdomain
assessed. The Adaptive Behavior Composite score is
considered to reflect the child’s overall level of adaptive
functioning.
Sparrow, S., Balla, D. & Cicchetti, D. (1984).
Vineland
Adaptive Behavior Scales:
Interview Edition Survey Form Manual.
American Guidance Service, Inc.
Adaptive Behavior Evaluation Scale
The Adaptive Behavior Evaluation Scale – Revised (ABES-R)
was developed to assess adaptive functioning in individuals
aged 5 to 18 years. It is a norm-referenced rating scale
containing 104 items, based on AAMR definition of adaptive
skills developed in 1991. The Home Version of the ABES-R is
completed by the child’s parent(s)/guardian(s). The School
Version of the ABES-R is completed by the child’s classroom
teacher(s). Ratings are made in the areas of Communication,
Self-Care, Home Living, Social skills, Community Use,
Self-Direction, Health and Safety, Functional Academics,
Leisure, and Work.
McCarney, S.B. (1995). Adaptive Behavior Scale – Revised.
Columbia,
MO: Hawthorne Educational Services, Inc.
Attention Deficit Disorders Evaluation Scale
The Attention Deficit Disorders Evaluation Scale (ADDES) was
developed to contribute to the identification of and service
delivery to students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity
Disorder. It is a norm-referenced rating scale with each
item based on factor analytic research. The Home Version of
the ADDES is completed by the child’s parent(s)/guardian(s).
The School Version of the ADDES is completed by the child’s
teacher(s). Ratings are made in the areas of Inattention,
Impulsivity, and Hyperactivity.
McCarney, S.B. (1995).
Attention Deficit Disorders Evaluation Scale. Columbia,
MO: Hawthorne Educational Services, Inc.
Emotional and Behavior Problem Scale
The Emotional and Behavior Problem Scale – Second Edition
(EBPS-2) was developed to contribute to the identification
of and service delivery to students with behavior disorders
and/or emotional disturbance. It is a norm-referenced
rating scale with each item based on the federal definition
of serious emotional disturbance and childhood disorders
identified through factor analytic research. The Home
Version of the EBPS is completed by the child’s parent(s)/guardian(s).
The School Version of the EBPS is completed by the child’s
teacher(s). Ratings are made in the areas of Learning,
Interpersonal Relations, Inappropriate Behavior,
Unhappiness/Depression, and Physical Symptoms/Fears.
McCarney, S.B. (2001). Emotional and Behavior Problem Scale
– Second Edition.
Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services, Inc.
Teacher’s
Checklist
The
Teacher’s Checklist is a comprehensive questionnaire
produced by Riverside Publishing, which is often used in
conjunction with the WJ III to gather information about the
child’s classroom behavior and skill levels. This
questionnaire is completed by the child’s classroom teacher
based on observations over the previous month. Ratings of
academic skills are made in the areas of listening
comprehension, oral expression, basic reading, reading
comprehension, math calculation, math reasoning, basic
writing, and written expression. Behavioral ratings are
made in the areas of attention, impulsivity, withdrawal,
activity level, organization, anxiousness, and
aggressiveness.
Parent’s
Checklist
The
Parent’s Checklist is a comprehensive questionnaire
produced by Riverside Publishing, which is often used in
conjunction with the WJ III to gather information about the
child’s early birth, medical, familial, behavioral, social,
and educational history. This questionnaire is completed by
the child’s parent(s)/guardian(s) based on historical
information and observations of the child’s behavior in the
home setting.

Weblinks
